Pitiful Page

(Inspired by Alan Kaufman’s “The Saddest Man on Earth”)

 

“The saddest man on Earth

Ignored how the rain felt as he left home for the first time.”

He let the rain dowse his clothes, dragging it to the ground

Like the sadness that dragged his heart into darkness.

He reflected on all that ate away at his heart

Until all that was left was a heavy weight at his core.

The rain would never be as chilling as the deaths

That haunted him into delirium at night.

The road would never be as lonely as the gray walls

That kept him in his room of solitude at 11:59 pm, New Year’s Eve.

The house never as empty as his hopes for mankind.

The fresh, open wounds never as as hurtful as the truths

That had stabbed his mind over the years.

The Ophelias never as despairingly beautiful

As the lies that drowned in his blood.

The abyss never as hollow as the hole in him

That was filled with misery,

That seeped in his veins and every atom in him.

The paintings never as aesthetically pleasing

As the cloud of self-loathe and sorrow

That man takes shelter in and calls home.

“The saddest man on Earth

Ignored how the rain felt as he left home for the last time.”

 

(Written ~April 2016; Revised 1.3.19)

Apple of My Eye

The apple of my eye

Has left me blind

And the rotting fruit

Has poisoned me to the root.

Now the fruit flies are caged within my lungs

And your words sound bitter on my tongue.

Through different eyes, I see my hopes have decayed

And in me the reality has weighed:

The apple of my eye is now a shriveled, perished, mush

So to survive, out of me it must be flushed.

 

(Revised 3.11.17)

Everything Beautiful is Far Away

I sat and peered at the stars twinkling in the ebony sky,

Appreciating their light-years long beauty as they decay.

I ponder how dying stars in space still shine so bright

While dying stars on earth dimmer and become gray.

Our bodies become lifeless as time swallows our glow,

But as we lose our light we see the light, they say.

Forth to the heavens, or space to join the stars

because everything beautiful is far away.

 

(Written 2.23.17)

Chicago: The Decaying Beauty

Chicago stands, smirking at his border states. A body full of life and power; who else could compare to him? Who could compare to his gift for spontaneously changing the atmosphere of a room no matter what Mother Nature says? Or to his abilities to pick out the best hotdog and pizza places for a hang out? And how about his glamour and personality that people have heard so many pleasant comments about?

How about his Sears Tower and Hancock building legs, giving him the height to look down upon the other cities? His perfect hair, slicked back to mimic the smooth curve of “the Bean.” His Lake Michigan wide smile that charms all to pull out their cameras and snap the beauty. A cool and independent rebel that walks his own path that no other has treaded on… but he has gotten lost.

He was too caught up in his appearance and is too arrogant to notice his internal flaws. He does not know that his self destructive behavior is causing his body and looks to fail him.

The organs within his body are unsynchronized. They close themselves off from each other, segregated, thinking that it is better to work independently and competitively than as one. Chicago forgets his identity, he forgets which sections build him up and which sections of himself he should avoid and fear. He tries to cover the disunity with his attractive appearance.

Chicago is wounded, but it seems like no matter how he changes his lifestyle the wounds will not heal. His cells, his people, die rapidly as he takes in more and more toxicity. He is the only thing hurting himself. He is aware that it is his own body and cells he is injuring but he can’t help it. He has lost himself to the corruption and hurting his body has turned into a habitual action. He injects himself with violence, crime, poverty, and fear; then he sits back and allows the drugs to do their work.

“Chiraq.”

He smirks at the nickname that he has been given and even answers to it. Who else has a nickname that can compare to his?

Deep down he knows he needs help, he knows that his issue is not getting any better. Chicago knows he is completely lost on his dark path, but to him it seems that there are no lights bright enough to illuminate his path to redemption.

An Ironic Epiphany from “The Book Thief”

“I wanted to explain that I am constantly overestimating and underestimating the human race- that rarely do I ever simply estimate it. I wanted to ask her how the same thing could be so ugly and so glorious, and its words and stories so damning and brilliant.
None of those things, however, came out of my mouth.
    All I was able to do was turn to Liesel Meminger and tell her the only truth I truly know. I said to the book thief and I say it now to you.
*** A Last Note From Your Narrator***
    I am haunted by humans.”
-The Book Thief, pg. 550, Markus Zusak

The Book Thief is a story about a young girl, Liesel Meminger, who becomes captivated with books and the power of words in Nazi Germany. Narrated by Death, the story follows Liesel as her world becomes chaotic as she and her family house a Jewish man and WWII continues to provide Death with nonstop work. When it becomes Liesel’s time to part from the world and Death finally encounters her, he presents to her and readers the final factual information he has gathered about the human race from his observations on them. Analyzing the quote above, Zusak uses periphrases and antithesis at the beginning of the quote, diction that reveals unwavering certainty throughout, and a final ironic statement to create a movement in the paragraph structure from a philosophical to a “logical truth” that emphasizes Death’s epiphany of the effect of human beings on him.

Analyzing the first part of Death’s quote, Zusak uses two literary techniques to display the narrator’s puzzlement over human beings. Periphrasis is a method of using more excessive, longer words or sentences to indirecting express something that could have been expressed with simple, short words or phrases. Instead of simply stating that Death “rarely ever simply estimates humans,” or even in the simplest form: that Death “did not understand humans and found them complex or contradictory,” Zusak uses the mentioned literary technique to show how complex Death’s thoughts on humans were. Death did not estimate people, he either went beyond in reflection of their abilities or he overlooked their abilities; he reflected in every direction besides the correct one on the matter of humans. Despite “constantly” making this mistake, he still cannot precisely estimate people because of how intricate they are. The use of periphrasis to elaborate and create a more difficult sentence from a simple thought mirrors Death’s excessive thoughts that also acknowledge and elaborates on the capabilities of the living.

The second sentence of the quote uses an antithesis, the placement of opposite ideas together in a sentence, and also uses the specific conjunction “and” to further display Death’s ongoing confusion. The narrator describes humans as “so ugly and so glorious” and their stories as “so damning and brilliant”; by using opposite words but using “and” to connect them, there becomes an emphasis on how both opposing adjectives can exist together within a single subject, being in this case humans and their writings. The use of the conjunction also retains the flow of the sentence, allowing it to be read in a smooth, contemplative tone. Whereas if Zusak had written that humans could be “so ugly but so glorious… so damning but brilliant,” the smooth flow of the sentence is no longer present because the the conjunction “but” emphasizes the contrast in the words. The same words that Zusak is trying to make exist in harmony by eliminating contrasting connecting words between them. Therefore, the use of an antithesis further expands on Death’s thoughts and also supports the periphrasis by using specific word choices to create a complex, seemingly contradictory, concept.

Zusak is precise with the diction he uses for the last paragraph of his novel: he uses words with steadfast, of certainty connotations to begin to transform Death’s observations on humans into what he believes to be a truth. There are five notable instances of this specific diction usage in Death’s final quote. The first instance is when the narrator admits that he constantly overestimates and underestimates. By using the word “constantly,” it is clear that the narrator’s actions are something he does on a frequent basis. He is not certain on how to just estimate humans but he is certain that he constantly does not estimate them, a simple truth to him. The second instance, connecting to the first, is when Death acknowledges that he rarely estimates humans. Similar to the first, constantly and rarely contrast each other because they are opposing and since Death confidently knows that he constantly does one thing, he can also be confident  that he rarely does the opposite. Instance 3 is when the narrator expresses how he wanted to tell Liesel the “only truth [he] truly [knew].” The use of the words truth, only, truly and know gives a sort of trustworthy tone and the firm connotations also makes the readers believe that Death knows for sure what he is presenting to the them. In fact, sandwiching “I” in between these four unwavering words has the effect of placing a seemingly factual value on Death’s upcoming words, supporting its truthfulness. In instance 4, Death addressed readers by writing that he tells Liesel a truth and he “[says] it now to [us]” too. The word “now” gives a precise moment, the present, in which Death is sure of. Also, the placement of the word holds value to the overall purpose of the quote, making it appear as a sudden factual, reliable realization. By placing “now” before “to you,” this creates an effect as if the truth the narrator wants to reveal is a universal statement that is applicable to all but for the time being he wants to inform us specifically of it. If “now” had been placed at the end of the sentence, like in “I say it to you now,” the effect is diluted because the sentence appears more passive when read as compared to the original sentence structure. The final instance of Zusak’s precise word choice is seen in the sentence “A Last Note From Your Narrator” when he creates a connection between Death and readers and now starts to introduce the epiphany of this spiritual entity. The usage of “last note” already allows readers to prepare for a final important statement because Zusak outright tells that a concluding remark is approaching. To further support the point that this concluding remark is a truth, the author reminds us that Death is our narrator. The use of the ownership pronoun creates a bond between the readers and narrator because it gives off the notion that the narrator is specifically here for us, to enlighten us (while saying “A last note from Death” would appear morbid and weaken the bond). That specific noun choice of using narrator in place of “Death” is also what makes his last note seem even more genuine and honest. The distinct diction that the author uses and the placement of the words become very important in making Death’s realization seem resolute.

Analyzing the paragraph structure of this quote, it becomes evident how the author structures Death’s quote to transition from  a philosophical tone into a simple truth. The first two sentences of the quote are long but with little punctuation marks. This results in making the sentences appear philosophical like because they reflect a run-off train of thought, which is exactly what Death was doing. As the quote goes on, the sentences become a more moderate length and then short statements. Right after the reflective train of thought, Death states that “none of [these] things, however, came out of [his] mouth” and then goes into his final remarks. The sentence just quoted serves as a break from the narrator’s thoughts. That specific sentence is what differentiates the philosophical tone from the incoming epiphany. Zusak structures the final ten lines from the novel in a way for the audience to follow a path of complex thoughts to a simple point.

Death finally admits that he is “haunted by humans” and this ironic epiphany is what Zusak has been building up to with the previous nine lines. This line is ironic because Death, the symbol for the end of a human’s life and eternal sleep, is haunted by the living. The word haunted in this sentence means to have or show signs of mental anguish or torment, it means for something to be persistently and disturbingly present. The fact that the human race could have such an impact on Death, the collector of souls, to the point of him feeling disturbed or tormented is an immensely ironic statement that stresses the haunting complexity of human beings on even immortal entities or spirits. This also connects back to the beginning of the quote because Death states that he rarely, not “never,” simply estimated people; this means that there are just very rare instances when he can be approximate about them. Zusak allows the narrator to present this rare instance when he can honestly state the living’s ability to haunt him. Again, being this reflected epiphany, the final line being ironic but simple allows it to appear as a rare truth.

The last pages of any novel or story has to be formed in a manner that leaves a memorable impression on the audience and can conclude the plot with a final powerful statement. Examining  the last ten lines from The Book Thief, Zusak’s techniques work in such a manner that each method supports each other and the overall point of the narrator’s experience and gives way to a powerful realization. The paraphrasis and antithesis at the beginning of the quote winds around Death’s ultimate point in an attempt to show his conflicting feelings and observations of the human race in a philosophical, poetic manner. Zusak’s diction with words that have resolute connotations create a mature, knowing tone in an attempt to strengthen the relationship between the narrator and reader by making Death appear trustworthy and mentor-like. The overall composition starts off reflective but then ends with a simple validity; the composition steadily flows towards the powerful truth that has to be expressed before the novel comes to an end. The finale of an ironic epiphany resonates within readers once the concept of Death himself being anguished by the human race is the last honest note that “our” narrator must express to us. Through the distinct writing method and techniques of Zusak, Death’s truly known truth hovers in the air for the audience to reflect on.

Calculating Urban Education: Professor Gutstein’s Equations for Solving Injustice

If a town had a calculated 640 liquor stores within its 3 mile radius from the Rodney King rebellion, 0 movie theaters, and 0 community centers, what does this tell us about the neighborhood and how it came to be this way?

There is a joke that some may know that surrounds the “evolution” of math; the joke basically gets at how the simple early grade school equation of 2+2=4 starts to include letters (x’s and y’s) and imaginary numbers (i) as a student progresses their mathematic skills. Yet, has anyone been introduced to a type of math that has a foundation within social contents? Despite the notion that social (justice) rhetoric resides only in the classroom of English, History, and the Humanities studies that serve to analyze it, Professor Rico Gutstein has proved that a math classroom also welcomes discourse of social issues.

After teaching mathematics at DePaul University in Chicago, Illinois for 7 years, Gutstein admitted that he realized that he could not “develop part of his writing as a teacher over there.” Southwest of DePaul University is the University of Illinois at Chicago, one out of the six leading research-oriented universities in the state. As a result of this and the diverse student body at the university, he was drawn to furthering his teachings there. “UIC gave more opportunities,” Professor Gutstein tells me. “It would be closer to my experience in life.” So he took his math skills to UIC where he could include and further his humanities goal within his profession.

Briefly asking a couple of students at the University of Illinois at Chicago who were enrolled in Professor Gutstein’s class their initial reaction to the type of word problems he presented, the students admitted an initial surprise to it. Afi Djisseglo, a UIC senior who is an Urban Education major and enrolled in Gutstein’s Curriculum Instruction 404 course, also known as the teaching of math in Urban Elementary Classroom, explained one of the first math problems the class was assigned to solve. “So he started off by introducing us to the Los Angeles race riots because of the beating of Rodney King. He talked about how there was a lot of looting in LA,” she recalled.

The Los Angeles race riots of 1992, also named the Rodney King riots, included a series of riots and looting after the acquitting of police officers who had been videotaped using excessive force on Rodney King. When I interviewed Professor Gutstein, he was sure to give this background context for the purpose of his math problem.

“He posed the question: in a town, suppose if the population was a certain amount, how many community centers, schools, and liquor stores should there be in a neighborhood? We had to use our best judgment to guess,” Djisseglo recites the problem, “and even though [students] got different numbers, everyone agreed that schools and community centers were the most important and there needed to be more of those. Then [Professor Gutstein] basically gave us information revealing how many actual liquor stores there was: in the 3 mile radius there was about 600 liquor stores.”

Taken out of context, the problem may have seemed like one of those exaggerated ones. Similar to something like Johnny having 300 different apple seeds and having to calculate how many to plant within a specific radius. Yet, considering the circumstances the problem is within, the mass number of 600 liquor stores does seem extreme for such a small area of a town. The students also realized this soon enough.

Djisseglo continued on the details following the revealing of the correct answer: “We had to calculate it like any other math problem and after that he had us compare it to what we thought and it was so much more. And there was so many liquor stores but not many community centers or schools and this gave us an idea of where city funding go. The schools and community centers combined did not even equal the amount of the liquor stores.”

The kids had to solve using the area and ratio of the town, basic math. Now the bigger problem that the students disclosed they did not expect to be answering was the “why” and “how” of the problem’s solution in its context. Gutstein remembered the day that he stopped his car and formed this math problem. “Then ask questions,” he considered. “How far do you walk before running into a liquor store?”

Beyond his teaching role on a college campus, Gutstein and the organization that he helped create, Teachers for Social Justice, have worked to solve some of the social problems in urban education and the Chicago area. When asked what sparked his interest in the creation of the organization, Gutstein specified two leading causes. “Attention for [educational shifts] and to support teachers in the classroom,” Gustein explains is one of the two causes. The second being to “teach in culturally relevant ways and challenge curriculum and tie it into lives of the community.” The “educational shifts” he was referring to were the closing schools within Chicago, the oppression towards teachers, and the major’s power over appointing of school boards. “An accountability madness,” Gutstein discerned. “Education turned into a business plan.”

Rico Gutstein grew up in the inner city, “the hood,” of New York in the 50s and 60s. At age 18, he left New York and returned again, involving himself in social movements in his hometown. In college, his goal was to be a computer scientist and speak out on public policies; Gutstein received his degree in computer science, completed his PhD, and moved into math education. In his position, he said he wanted to “bring together ideas of social movement, history in 60s and 70s into teaching math.” He taught at Chicago Public Schools as a math teacher for middle-schoolers. Afterwards, he took his teaching career over to DePaul University from 1994 to 2001 before finally bringing his work to the UIC campus in 2001 to present times. He also often contributes to “Rethinking Schools,” a nonprofit organization and co-sponsor for some of the TSJ events that also seeks to aid students in learning and the manner in which education is being taught.

From doing research on the start of his professional career, his works and organization have made breakthroughs that multiple websites and members of the public have recognized. In 2005, the professor was “part of the Design Team that founded Chicago’s Social Justice High School (Lawndale),” the UIC website informed. The organization that he was a founding member of, Teachers for Social Justice (TSJ), was established in 1998 and has been playing an active role in the education and reformation of the Chicago region since its formation. Educational activists in the organization, like Gutstein, work to “develop critical and culturally relevant curriculum and pedagogy for use in K-12 schools.” TSJ is part of a national network of similar groups across the country but the organization serves for tackling the specific issues and injustices in the local area of Chicago.

Gutstein talked about many of the previous events and works he and the organization have have created, meanwhile being unfunded and 100% volunteer-based. “Another world is possible and necessary,” he recited, was the theme of a curriculum fair that they hosted a previous year. Teachers for Social Justice do an annual TSJ fair that has had large 900 participants over the series of several years. In addition to the annual fair, many other events and discussion have been born from the organization. Last year one of these included the defunding of policing, funding of communities and schools, teach-ins, and anti-racist teachings. In the summer of 2015, there was even a diet hunger strike.

“Development has been an evolution,” Professor Gutstein says as he states that the organization will turn 20 years old next year. He recalls important moments of the movement that he was involved in, including the CTU strike and the hunger strike. “Honor the hunger strike, not the strikers” was a motto amongst the participants of the strike.

In that summer of ’15, there was a goal to help the closed Walter Dyett High School building, the volunteers sought to create the Walter Dyett High School for Global Leadership and Green Technology. Gutstein helped with the proposal for the idea, aiding with the design and coordinating the writing of it. The goal extended from just education reform to the establishing of better, healthier food sources for the children and community. Relating back to the liquor store problem, the establishing of more efficient institutions and healthier markets is a solution to counter the detrimental aspects that are harming the neighborhoods and its youths.

Rico Gutstein’s involvement and preparations in TSJ is still taking place and growing. Future events are being worked on for the year and near future. The organization will be sponsoring some events, two of which are occurring in November. Trips to Cuba and Chile are being arranged for a 2 week delegation of 14 volunteers (4 of which or younger participants) for education and social goals. On November 18, 2017, Teachers for Social Justice will be holding their 16th Curriculum Fair at North Ground High School on 4338 W. Wabansia Ave.

He has written on problems of math equity for various academic publications and his invests his academic time into training his students and future teachers with effective and social-issue solving pedagogies. “In my work, I argue that K-12 students need to be prepared through their mathematics education to investigate and critique injustice (such as racism and language discrimination),” Gutstein reports on his staff page of the UIC College of Education site, “and to challenge, in words and actions, oppressive structures and acts. I prepare teachers who can teach mathematics and other subjects in this manner to students in urban settings.”

Rico Gutstein has dedicated his life to reshaping education and how students should learn about math and the world around them. From a young man who got himself involved in social movements, he even began to reshape his own mathematical knowledge to include realistic problems that plague urban societies to now. Gutstein has not only made his mark with his dedication to helping the youth, education, and communities, but he has also provided future educators who are enrolled in his class with the means to make a different. His role in Teachers for Social Justice and many contributions to society, including the invitation of volunteers to help make an impact in the city, has become an equation can may solve some of the educational and social issues of Chicago, one variable at a time.

Press Release

For more information: 176530@email4pr.com

800-632-1400 ext. 550

Social Services Agencies in North Carolina Investigate 121,000 Cases of Child Neglect and Abuse

More than 121,000 cases of child neglect and abuse have been investigated across North Carolina by the Social Service agencies from July 2016 to June 2017.

The Children’s Home Society of North Carolina provided data and analysis reveals a correlation between the thousands of children victims and the number of families living in unhealthy environments.

“Often we parent based on the parenting that we received, and so if that wasn’t the best parenting, we may not be the best parents,” Matt Anderson, of the Children’s Home Society, said. “But we can learn new strategies, new techniques, new ways to parent successfully and that’s the kind of thing that we need to do as a community, as a society, to help these families,” he added.

Individuals and institutions are required to report any suspected child abuse or neglect to the Division of Social Services (DSS) by NC state law. The North Carolina DSS investigates and evaluates reported cases, detecting possible problems within the family and providing services to aid them; the DSS can also petition the court for the removal of the child from his or her home.

Anderson admits that high numbers for cases does not necessarily mean that a child should be removed from a home but rather that the parents need extra assistance. “There are a number of circumstances often times that are combined together in more than just one issue that puts parents under a lot of stress and that will impact their ability to parent,” he said.

The Children’s Home Society seeks to help victims and their families live a better life by providing the assistance needed to sustain a positive, nurturing environment. The organization helps support 20,000 children and their families in North Carolina through a diverse range of methods and programs. They have already effectively seen about 90% of the families in these child neglect and abuse cases stay together and take the steps towards recovery.

To receive more information on these child abuse and neglect cases in North Carolina, The Children’s Home Society of North Carolina can be contacted through the email or telephone number that was provided.

###

Fake News Makes its Way from Trump’s Tweets to the UIC Campus

An article entitled “Americans Believe They Can Detect Fake News. Studies Show They Can’t” on the Forbes website explains a new study: a study from the Pew Research Center revealed that 64% of people believe that fake news is creating confusion and issues in today’s society. Although 39% of people feel “very confident” in recognizing fake news with a following 45% feeling “somewhat confident,” a Buzzfeed poll discovered that a stunning 75% of Americans had believed fake news about the election to be accurate. The rise of President Trump’s tweets, accusing news outlets of being “fake news,” has brought the issue further under our noses (whether it was there before or not). It cannot be denied that this issue is one that threatens the knowledge of Americans and the information they are fed as the media expands. The issue was taken to University of Illinois at Chicago to see if the students on campus had a concern on the topic and whether they would be able to distinguish real from fake news.

What exactly comes to one’s mind when the phrase “fake news” is spoken? Elizabeth Rodriguez, a sophomore who majors in Integrated Health Studies and identifies as a liberal, stated that the phrase makes her think of news that is “produced or maybe even exaggerated by media as a way to distract from something else.” Three other students interviewed explained along the same thought of it being inaccurate news that is missing parts or the whole truth (although the other three did not mention the factor of possibly for the purpose of distracting society). When asked of their concern on the topic relative to the recent tweets from Trump, the first interviewee explained that her concern for fake news has not changed since Trump’s tweets and she feels that illegitimate news stories were always present but that the president’s announcement of it “does make you think what other things could be going on without using that ‘fake’ news as a facade.” Melissa Solis, a freshman majoring in Communications who identified as a Democrat, disclosed that her interest has increased but she has always been somewhat concerned over the topic. Similar to Solis, Jackie Diaz, a sophomore majoring in the Teaching of History who identifies with the Democratic Party, admitted that her concern for this topic has increased since the president’s mention of it. Afi Djisseglo, a senior who majors in the Teaching of English and identified as an Independent party, expressed that with the phrase “fake news,” Donald Trump, George Orwell, and the United States came to her mind. She hinted at the idea of the American media in general becoming controlled and untrustworthy, like that of the dystopian world created by the author Orwell. She goes on to say how since Trump’s tweets she “has not thought about news but more so how pathetic American politics [and media] has become.”

When asked where she gets her news from, Rodriguez answered that she gets most from mainstream news outlets and admittedly, a lot from social media. Meanwhile, Diaz specified that her news comes from the television, mostly Telemundo and Fox, and that she “sometimes [does her] own research.” Solis gets her news mostly from CNN and The New York Times. Djisseglo revealed that she gets her news mostly from Twitter and Tumblr because “it occurs in real times and [appears] faster than news outlets like CNN.” Her response gives insight to the option of social media as a better news form due to the increase of citizen journalism; some Americans feel that these sites are more trustworthy than ones they feel are controlled by bigger industries.

As stated before, Buzzfeed found that a great 75% of Americans failed in identifying a fake story during the elections last year. Three of the interviewees voice that they are not surprised by the large number of people who failed at distinguishing real from fake; Diaz even suggested that “ignorance is an effect” of this large number of misled people. Solis is the only one to confessed that she would be “a little surprised” because she “likes to think that Americans are a little smarter than that.” When asked to review two articles from different news sites, all three were confident in their answers of which article was legit or not while Djisseglo was not completely sure about her final answers; all three switched the legit and illegitimate articles except for Diaz who thought both were real news. Surprisingly, the result of the four students interviewed revealed that they were a part of the 75% of Americans who could not tell the real news from the fake one. What is fascinating about their results is that when told the truth about the two articles, they all asked for proof of why the fake one was fake (but not of why the real one was real). The students read the first few sentences or paragraph but must have completely ignored or skimmed through the middle of the fake news that had written within its body that it was clearly a fake article and the website itself is satire and falsely reports. This up brings a question of whether “fake news” and its concern has more to do with news outlets or with individuals in society.

A link to the two articles used in this research are provided below. See if you can tell which is a legitimate news story and which is a satire:

http://abcnews.com.co/obama-signs-executive-order-banning-sale-of-assault-weapons/

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/2731194-cleveland-police-wont-hold-american-flag-at-browns-opener-over-anthem-protests?utm_source=cnn.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=editorial